We’ve all been to meetings in which both of the scenarios that Zach Snook, audio products manager for Biamp Systems, describes play out:
Scenario No. 1 is when the video for a video call isn’t working.
Scenario No. 2 is when the audio for a video call isn’t working.
Under scenario No. 1, the meeting is likely to happen despite the technical mishap, with the conversation continuing without a video complement.
Under scenario No. 2, the meeting simply won’t happen — unless the participants are fluent in sign language.
Where Are Your Meeting Room Audio Priorities?
It’s interesting, therefore, that tech decisions makers so often make the huge mistake of prioritizing video over audio when planning meeting rooms, points out Snook.
Sister site Commercial Integrator recently posted a Deep Dive survey on meeting room audio that reflects a disturbing trend when it comes to budgeting for meeting room audio:
- 27% of tech decisions makers are unlikely to budget appropriately for meeting room loudspeakers
- 66% of tech decisions are only somewhat likely to budget appropriately for meeting room loudspeakers
- 35% of tech decisionsare unlikely to budget appropriately for meeting room microphones
- 49% are only somewhat likely to budget appropriately for meeting room microphones
- Cameras, video display, video collaboration and video conferencing all are prioritized over both microphones and loudspeakers when it comes to budgeting for meeting rooms
Meeting Room Audio Should Be a Priority
When tech decision makers choose not to emphasis audio when planning meeting rooms “it’s a huge mistake and one that people have pain points on all the time,” says Snook in a video interview with CI.
Meetings are changing, he says, they’re more frequent and require more flexibility.
Some meeting rooms, such as multi-purpose spaces, might require a presentation to take place one day before completely restructuring for a work group meeting the next.
Related: How to Purchase the Perfect Video Conferencing Solution for Your Company
The challenge for integrators and their customers is to create the audio flexibility needed to optimize these meetings. “At Biamp we’ve come up with a series of beam-tracking microphones for our Tesira and Devio product lines,” he says.
“The advantage we see in those microphones is you can drop them into complex spaces. We have calculators to make sure that you have the required areas that need to be covered. Then the microphones themselves sort of come alive and find people who are talking and using the room and lock them in.”
The point is that prioritizing meeting room audio isn’t as difficult as most tech decisions makers seem to make it. You should lean on a good integrator to provide education on your options, on the value of quality and on flexible audio for meeting rooms.
Watch the video above as Snook explains the challenges around meeting room audio and Biamp’s easy-to-use solutions for planning meeting rooms.
If you enjoyed this article and want to receive more valuable industry content like this, click here to sign up for our digital newsletters!
I thought that it was interesting that you said that sometimes poor audio planning was made when creating a meeting room in within your business. I would imagine that this would create a distraction from important business meetings. I would consider renting a meeting venue in order to avoid distractions and to be able to focus on making important decisions.